Government Abuse - Natural Law Remedies
Alternative Health Care

by

Richard Walbaum

Copyright 2005

Learn Why
Government Cannot Suppress Cures to Disease
Government Cannot Regulate You Out of Existence
Government Cannot Make Vitamins Into Prescription Drugs

There is an urgent need to present a theory of law capable of turning the tide against government suppression in the area of health care. To practice your healing arts free from government suppression, you must stop playing in the governments sandbox where they make the rules, and start playing in yours.

WILL THESE THEORIES WORK?

Only time will tell. They are closest to the Truth, and if Truth fails, nothing will succeed. But of the various remedies discussed, religious free exercise has been proven to be an effective bat against government; no judge wants to touch it. And while others have been sent to jail for manufacturing and selling electromedicine healing devices, I have not received a single letter from the government.

With the coming Codex Alimentarius threatening to soon convert vitamins into prescription drugs, I rushed to get this information published on the Internet. It is not as well organized as it could be, the new material a bit verbose, and there is more to post, but this will have to do.

SUMMARY OF LEGAL THEORY

Today government forbids right action and compels wrong action, and because of corruption, the common law seems incapable of providing relief. We must look elsewhere.

Federal and state constitutions recognize that your rights come from God, a sovereign lawmaker Whom we owe superior duty and allegiance. Natural Law, another phrase for the Will of God, is in fact a traditional body of law that has been dormant from lack of use. If you apply Natural Law to the exclusion of statutes, government will find it exceedingly difficult to suppress due to lack of sovereignty. How can government claim sovereignty over God?

The states are forbidden from delegating their power of legislating to the federal government. By the same theory, the federal government should be barred from delegating its power to the UN. And, the regulation of health and safety is a state power; the federal government cannot convert vitamins into prescription drugs as this usurps the police powers of the states.

“Contact your congressman” is all well and good, but being as we have the best congress money can buy, we should be looking to the courts for relief instead; the federal government is trying to exercise a power it does not have, and worse, if the UN can be delegated the power to legislate, this will create a precedent that will usher in a one world government.

IMPORTANT NOTICE

If you use this theory, the last thing we want is to destroy it from improper use. Contact me for help; use the address listed at www.hiddencures.com/contact.htm; it changes due to spam.

Do not copy this report; it is copyrighted. Instead, link to this page so people can view the latest document versions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Learn the cause, cure, and means of prevention for cancer at www.Hidden-Cancer-Cures.com; and for diabetes at www.Hidden-Diabetes-Cures.com. And you can find an inexpensive water ionizer at www.HiddenCures.com.

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

The purpose of this report is to teach you what your rights are and how to assert them, especially in the area of alternative health care. It is based upon the practice of Natural Law which is another phrase for the Will of God, which naturally leads into religious free exercise.

This information is designed to provide my opinions based on research of the subject matter covered. It is not provided for the purposes of rendering legal advice. It should give you ideas or approaches of how to solve your legal problems trying to practice your healing arts. The reader should prove all things to himself, and accept all responsibility for his actions.

You will learn that federal and state constitutions recognize that your rights come from God who is the sovereign lawmaker; that government did not give you your rights but merely protects them; that government actually recognizes this fact and allows you to follow the Will of God under statute and under First Amendment Religious Free exercise.

When you read your state or federal constitutions, it is apparent that government is not respecting your rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and in fact has converted your right to the pursuit of happiness into a right to property. This has the effect of removing spirit from government, allowing government to pass laws that trample your feelings and treat you as a child, even though on the surface they appear reasonable. My purpose is to re-establish the link between the truths about life, and the purpose and limitations of government. We will learn about God as Lawmaker, and the limits to government powers. Our goal is to educate government about these truths in order to have them respect our rights, but if they don’t, then we can resort to religious free exercise. This new understanding can be used as a legal basis to assert your rights in different areas of life.

Since God is recognized by government as the sovereign lawmaker, my discussion about God is not academic. Natural Law and First Amendment Religious Free Exercise are foundation stones of my legal theory. Beliefs about God are a very personal and individual matter, and whether you are a Christian, Jew, or Hindu, don’t be disturbed by what I say when I lay down this legal position. Use your own beliefs and your own scriptures. If you are an atheist, you may have a problem.

God’s Will is the same thing as Natural Law, and Natural Law is superior to man made law, and our government is based on this principle and does respect it. We have a right and duty to follow God’s law, and to exercise our God given unalienable right to the exclusion of man made law whenever there is a conflict, and government is foreclosed from infringing upon these rights and duties.

As a starting point, you will learn how the people gave the federal government its power, that the federal constitution is an enumerated grant of power and the government has no powers except those specifically enumerated, or necessary by implication, and that the federal government is not given the power to regulate food, medicine, or physicians, but can only regulate these in interstate commerce.

You will learn that the states have what are called police powers which allow the states to pass any law they want to protect the morals, health, safety, peace, and general welfare of the people. You will learn why freedom is the rule, and regulation the exception, that police powers can only be used to protect society from harm, that if there is no harm, there can be no regulation.

You will learn why federal and state powers must be exercised with regard to protections and rights, that it would be a strange interpretation of the constitution if government powers were interpreted liberally, while individual rights were interpreted narrowly.

We will see that the states have exceeded the limits of the police powers by passing laws that do not protect society from harm, and may even cause society harm by preventing cures to diseases from being distributed by alternative health care practitioners.

We will demand that laws which prevent a healer and a sick person from coming together of their own free will, which causes no harm to society, not be applied to us as they are an unconstitutional exercise of the police powers in violation of our right to pursue safety and happiness, that we appreciate the gesture but waive the protection of the state, and elect Natural Law in place of man made law to protect us from malpractice, and if necessary assert our right to do so under First Amendment Free Exercise.

If you are called upon to argue your case in court, I believe that you will need to educate the court with this information. Certainly the average person does not know what his rights are or what the source and limits to government power are, and the average lawyer or judge doesn’t either. I would not assume that the judge knows this information, so I would include it in my arguments to the court.

I have often been irritated by patriots who go into court using lame brained theories of law, and wonder why the judge pukes on them. Be sure you can cite prior court decisions to back your position. If there are none, say so, and bring it under Natural Law or Religious Free Exercise. Under Natural Law, the judges duty is to harmonize diverse interests, and he will be held accountable by a Higher power if he refuses.

Your next step is to read several chapters excerpted from my book The Poverty Trap copyright 1992, which will explain where our rights come from, where government powers come from, and their limits. Then we will apply that knowledge to the specific area of alternative health care.

I will be citing with permission from American Jurisprudence, published by The Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co., Rochester, N.Y., copyright 1962, and Corpus Juris secundum, published by West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minn., copyright 1985, both large legal encyclopedias, as well as from court reports.

You can look up a report in the law library from the citation I provide; for example: Roe v. Wade, 314 Federal Supplement 1217 at 1223 (1970). Federal Supplement is just one of many encyclopedias containing hundreds of volumes of reported court cases; 314 is the volume that Roe v. Wade is in. 1217 is the page it starts on, and 1223 is the page being quoted. Often a date is given, in this case 1970.

Now, read Chapters 5, 6, and 19.

Ch. 5: Where Rights and Government Powers Come From

Ch. 6: Bodies of Law

Ch. 19: How to Run a Private Business